4.7 Article

Advanced algorithms for multidimensional sensitivity studies of large-scale air pollution models based on Sobol sequences

Journal

COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 338-351

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.07.005

Keywords

Monte Carlo method; Multidimensional integration; Sobol sequences; Scrambled Sobol sequences

Funding

  1. Bulgarian NSF [DTK 02/44/2009, DCVP 02/1, DMU 03/61/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper advanced variance-based algorithms for global sensitivity analysis are studied. We consider efficient algorithms, such as Monte Carlo, quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) and scrambled quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms based on Sobol sequences. Low discrepancy Lambda Pi(tau), Sobol sequences are considered as a basis. Two other approaches are also analyzed. The first one is an efficient Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm for multidimensional integration based on modified Sobol sequences (MCA-MSS) and proposed in an earlier work by some of the authors Dimov and Georgieva (2011) [28]. The second one is a randomized QMC algorithm proposed by Art Owen (1995) [20]. The procedure of randomization in the latter case is also known as Owen scrambling. The algorithms considered in this work are applied to sensitivity studies of air pollution levels calculated by the Unified Danish Eulerian Model (UNI-DEM) to some chemical reaction rates. UNI-DEM is chosen as a case study since it constitutes a typical large-scale mathematical model in which the chemical reactions are adequately presented. Extensive numerical experiments are performed to support the theoretical studies and to analyze applicability of algorithms under consideration to various classes of problems. Conclusions about the applicability and efficiency of the algorithms under consideration are drawn. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available