4.7 Article

Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 217-229

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.002

Keywords

Hesitant fuzzy set; Multi-attribute group decision making; Incomplete preference; Interval programming

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61273209]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CXZZ13_0139]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to employ the main structure of LINMAP (LINear programming technique for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference) to propose an interval programming method for solving multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the ratings of alternatives are taken as hesitant fuzzy elements (HFEs) and all pair-wise comparison judgments over alternatives are represented by interval numbers. The contribution of this study is fivefold: (1) we define the new consistency and inconsistency indices; (2) we construct an interval programming model to determine the hesitant fuzzy positive ideal solution and the optimal weights of attributes, and at the same time present a decision algorithm; (3) we discuss several special cases of the proposed model in detail; (4) we show that compared with intuitionistic fuzzy LINMAP method (Li et al., 2010), the proposed approach reveals more useful information including the interval preference information, and does not need to transform HFEs into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers but directly deals with MAGDM problems and thus obtains better final decision results; and (5) we demonstrate the applicability and implementation process of the proposed approach by using an energy project selection example. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available