4.2 Article

Assortment of magnetic nanospinels for activation of distinct inorganic oxidants in photo-Fenton's process

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
Volume 402, Issue -, Pages 53-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.03.009

Keywords

Photo-Fenton; Spinel ferrites; Heterogeneous catalysis; Magnetic; Inorganic oxidants

Funding

  1. DST (SERB)
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic spinel ferrites in the nano range, having general formula MFe2O4 (M = Cu, Zn, Ni and Co) were prepared using facile sol-gel methodology. The physicochemical properties of prepared ferrites characterized using FTIR, powder XRD and HRTEM stipulated formation of single phase cubic spinel structure. The band gap of all the ferrites was found in the range 1.26-2.08 eV, consequently could be photo-excited by visible light. The present study evaluates the capacity of all the synthesized ferrites to activate different inorganic oxidants i.e., hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), potassium peroxodisulphate (K2S2O8), potassium peroxymonosulphate (KHSO5) and potassium bromate (KBrO3) in photo-Fenton process. The results disclosed fascinating behavior of peroxymonosulphate as it could be stimulated at neutral pH while for all other oxidants, acidic medium was required. Furthermore, the concentration of peroxymonosulphate during the reactions was 4 times less than other oxidizing agents. The degradation rate was found to decrease in order H2O2 > KHSO5 > K2S2O8 > KBrO3. When H2O2 and KHSO5 were used the reactivity of ferrites followed the order CuFe2O4>ZnFe2O4>NiFe2O4>CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4>CuFe2O4>NiFe2O4>ZnFe2O4, respectively. The prepared materials were chemically stable and magnetically recoverable after the reaction hence, was reused without any significant loss in activity. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available