4.7 Article

Load Love numbers and Green's functions for elastic Earth models PREM, iasp91, ak135, and modified models with refined crustal structure from Crust 2.0

Journal

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 190-199

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.06.022

Keywords

Loading Love numbers; Green's function; PREM; iasp91 and ak135; Crust 2.0

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40825012, 41021003, 41174016]
  2. National key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB957703]
  3. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams [KZZD-EW-TZ-05]
  4. Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAK12B02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Load Love numbers and Green's functions are computed for elastic Earth models PREM, iasp91 and ak135, and their modified models with refined crustal structure from Crust 2.0. It is found that the differences of results between iasp91 or ak135 and PREM, and the effects of refinement of crustal structure are significant for the Love numbers of degrees from around 200 to very high numbers, and for the Green's functions in the near-field. The results of the models given in this paper are applicable to the studies related to loading processes (present surface mass transport as measured by GRACE and GPS, ocean tide loading, etc.), making it possible to use different models or assess the uncertainties of solutions of the loading problems under investigation. In order to ensure the stability of the solutions for degrees larger than 360 (or when the resolution is less than 55 km), a variable transformation on the solution vector is used in this paper and proved to work effectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available