4.7 Article

A variable precision rough set approach to the remote sensing land use/cover classification

Journal

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 1466-1473

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.11.010

Keywords

Remote sensing classification; Knowledge discovery; Overlapping data; Variable precision rough sets; VPRS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40871188]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZCX2-YW-Q10-1-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays the rough set method is receiving increasing attention in remote sensing classification although one of the major drawbacks of the method is that it is too sensitive to the spectral confusion between-class and spectral variation within-class. In this paper, a novel remote sensing classification approach based on variable precision rough sets (VPRS) is proposed by relaxing subset operators through the inclusion error beta. The remote sensing classification algorithm based on VPRS includes three steps: (1) spectral and textural information (or other input data) discretization, (2) feature selection, and (3) classification rule extraction. The new method proposed here is tested with Landsat-5 TM data. The experiment shows that admitting various inclusion errors beta, can improve classification performance including feature selection and generalization ability. The inclusion of beta also prevents the overfitting to the training data. With the inclusion of beta, higher classification accuracy is obtained. When beta=0 (i.e., the original rough set based classifier), overfitting to the training data occurs, with the overall accuracy=0.6778 and unrecognizable percentage=12%. When beta=0.07, the highest classification performance is reached with overall accuracy and unrecognizable percentage up to 0.8873% and 2.6%, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available