4.7 Article

DULIP: A Dual Luminescence-Based Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay for Interactome Mapping in Mammalian Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 427, Issue 21, Pages 3375-3388

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.08.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundations [SFB740]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  3. European Union
  4. Helmholtz Association
  5. [SFB740: 740/2-11]
  6. [NeuroNet: 01GS08169-73]
  7. [MooDS: 01GS08150]
  8. [Integrament: 01ZX1314C]
  9. [Mutanom: 01GS08108]
  10. [EuroSpin: Health-F2-2009-241498]
  11. [SynSys: HEALTH-F2-2009-242167]
  12. [HelMA: HA-215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mapping of protein protein interactions (PPIs) is critical for understanding protein function and complex biological processes. Here, we present DULIP, a dual luminescence-based co-immunoprecipitation assay, for systematic PPI mapping in mammalian cells. DULIP is a second-generation luminescence-based PPI screening method for the systematic and quantitative analysis of co-immunoprecipitations using two different luciferase tags. Benchmarking studies with positive and negative PPI reference sets revealed that DULIP allows the detection of interactions with high sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, the analysis of a PPI reference set with known binding affinities demonstrated that both low- and high-affinity interactions can be detected with DULIP assays. Finally, using the well-characterized interaction between Syntaxin-1 and Munc18, we found that DULIP is capable of detecting the effects of point mutations on interaction strength. Taken together, our studies demonstrate that DULIP is a sensitive and reliable method of great utility for systematic interactome research. It can be applied for interaction screening and validation of PPIs in mammalian cells. Moreover, DULIP permits the specific analysis of mutation-dependent binding patterns. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available