4.7 Article

Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum

Journal

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 185-197

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.022

Keywords

Applications in subject areas; Architectures for educational technology system; Interactive learning environments; Teaching/learning strategies

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, Republic of China [NSC-99-2511-S-003-026-MY3, NSC-100-2628-S-011-001-MY4, NSC-99-2511-S-011-007-MY3, 101WFA0300229]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mobile guide system that integrates art appreciation instruction with augmented reality (AR) was designed as an auxiliary tool for painting appreciation, and the learning performance of three groups of visiting participants was explored: AR-guided, audio-guided, and nonguided (i.e., without carrying auxiliary devices). The participants were 135 college students, and a quasi-experimental research design was employed. Several learning performance factors of the museum visitors aided with different guided modes were evaluated, including their learning effectiveness, flow experience, the amount of time spent focusing on the paintings, behavioral patterns, and attitude of using the guide systems. The results showed that compared to the audio- and nonguided participants, the AR guide effectively enhanced visitors' learning effectiveness, promoted their flow experience, and extended the amount of time the visitors spent focusing on the paintings. In addition, the visitors' behavioral patterns were dependent upon the guided mode that they used; the visitors who were the most engaged in the gallery experience were those who were using the AR guide. Most of the visitors using the mobile AR-guide system elicited positive responses and acceptance attitudes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available