4.6 Article

The HELD algorithm for multicomponent, multiphase equilibrium calculations with generic equations of state

Journal

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 99-118

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.07.009

Keywords

Phase equilibrium; Phase stability; Helmholtz free energy; Global optimisation; Equations of state; Statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT)

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK
  2. EPSRC [GR/T17595, GR/N35991, GR/R09497, EP/E016340]
  3. Joint Research Equipment Initiative (JREI) [GR/M94427]
  4. Royal Society-Wolfson Foundation
  5. EPSRC [EP/E016340/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E016340/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The HELD (Helmholtz free Energy Lagrangian Dual) algorithm is proposed to solve the isothermal, isobaric phase equilibrium problem (P, T flash). The flash is posed as a minimisation of the Helmholtz free energy in the volume-composition space, reformulated through duality theory. The proposed solution strategy consists of: an initialisation stage, containing a stability test; a phase identification stage, in which linear and nonconvex optimisation problems are solved alternatively; and an acceleration and convergence stage. The stability test is solved with a tunneling algorithm and the nonconvex part of the second stage with a multistart approach. Examples are presented for three equations of state, SRK, SAFT-HS and SAFT-VR. Non-ideal mixtures of up to fifteen components are examined; they exhibit features such as azeotropy, liquid-liquid, and liquid-liquid-liquid equilibria. The HELD algorithm is found to be reliable over a variety of challenging phase behaviour, converging to the best known solution in all of the calculations undertaken. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available