4.6 Article

Integrated solvent and process design using a SAFT-VR thermodynamic description: High-pressure separation of carbon dioxide and methane

Journal

COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 474-491

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.06.016

Keywords

Solvent and process design; CAMD; SAFT; CO(2) capture; Natural gas

Funding

  1. Schlumberger Cambridge Research
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK
  3. Joint Research Equipment Initiative JREI [GR/M94427]
  4. Royal Society-Wolfson Foundation
  5. EPSRC [GR/T17595, GR/N35991, GR/R09497, EP/E016340]
  6. EPSRC [EP/E016340/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E016340/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing importance of natural gas as an energy source poses separation challenges, due to the high pressures and high carbon dioxide concentrations of many natural gas streams. A methodology for computer-aided molecular and process design (CAMPD) applicable to such extreme conditions is presented, based on the integration of process and cost models with an advanced molecular-based equation of state, the statistical associating fluid theory for potentials of variable range (SAFT-VR). The approach is applied to carbon dioxide capture from methane using physical absorption. The search for an optimal solvent is focused on n-alkane blends. A simple flowsheet is optimised using two objectives: maximum purity and maximum net present value. The best equipment sizes, operating conditions, and average chain length of the solvent (the n-alkane) are identified, indicating n-alkane solvents offer a promising alternative. The proposed methodology can readily be extended to wider classes of solvents and to other challenging processes. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available