4.7 Article

Function-based morphing methodology for parameterizing patient-specific models of human proximal femurs

Journal

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 31-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.003

Keywords

Parameterization; Function-based morphing; Biomechanical function; Proximal femur geometry; Patient-specific model

Funding

  1. research fund of the Survivability Technology Defense Research Center of the Agency for Defense Development of Korea [UD090090GD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel morphing method for parameterizing patient-specific femur models based on femoral biomechanical functions. The proposed function-based morphing (FBM) method aims to provide a robust way to independently morph each partial functional region of the target femur structure by simply assigning the given functional parameters such as the femoral head diameter, neck length and diameter, and neck inclination angle. FBM includes three steps: (1) feature recognition to segment a femoral model into functional regions, (2) simplification to estimate the original parameters of the model and to define the morphing criteria as geometrical constraints, and (3) morphing to obtain the required shape by applying FBM fields that convert the terms of parametric changes into morphing vector terms for each segmented region. The proposed method was validated on a total of 48 patient-specific femur models. These models were parameterized and morphed without unexpected parametric changes, and the averaged error between the required parameters and the re-estimated parameters after morphing was 3.47%. Our observations indicate that the variation models developed in this study can be used as fundamentals for various functional sensitivity analyses for predicting changes in biomechanical responses due to the morphological changes of a subject-specific femur structure. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available