4.6 Article

A comparison of methods for sketch-based 3D shape retrieval

Journal

COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 57-80

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2013.11.008

Keywords

Sketch-based 3D model retrieval; Evaluation; SHREC contest; Large-scale; Benchmark

Funding

  1. Army Research Office grant [W911NF-12-1-0057]
  2. Texas State University Research Enhancement Program (REP)
  3. NSF [CRI 1305302]
  4. Shape Metrology IMS
  5. Fondecyt (Chile) [1110111]
  6. FCT [Pest-OE/EEI/LA0021/2013]
  7. Fraunhofer IDM@NTU
  8. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23500117] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sketch-based 3D shape retrieval has become an important research topic in content-based 3D object retrieval. To foster this research area, two Shape Retrieval Contest (SHREC) tracks on this topic have been organized by us in 2012 and 2013 based on a small-scale and large-scale benchmarks, respectively. Six and five (nine in total) distinct sketch-based 3D shape retrieval method have competed each other in these two contests, respectively. To measure and compare the performance of the top participating and other existing promising sketch-based 3D shape retrieval methods and solicit the state-of-the-art approaches, we perform a more comprehensive comparison of fifteen best (four top participating algorithms and eleven additional state-of-the-art methods) retrieval methods by completing the evaluation of each method on both benchmarks. The benchmarks, results, and evaluation tools for the two tracks are publicly available on our websites [1,2]. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available