4.6 Article

Kernel feature selection to fuse multi-spectral MRI images for brain tumor segmentation

Journal

COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 256-269

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.09.007

Keywords

SVM; Segmentation; Feature selection; Fusion; Follow-up system; Brain tumor; MRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a framework of a medical image analysis system for the brain tumor segmentation and the brain tumor following-up over time using multi-spectral MRI images. Brain tumors have a large diversity in shape and appearance with intensities. Multi-spectral images have the advantage in providing complementary information to resolve some ambiguities. However, they may also bring along a lot of redundant information, increasing the data processing time and segmentation errors. The challenge is how to make use of the multi-spectral images effectively. Our idea of fusing these data is to extract the most useful features to obtain the best segmentation with the least cost in time. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification integrated with a selection of the features in a kernel space is proposed. The selection criteria are defined by the kernel class separability. Based on this SVM classification a framework to follow up the brain tumor evolution is proposed, which consists of the following steps: (1) to learn the brain tumor and select the features from the first MRI examination of the patients; (2) to automatically segment the tumor in new data using SVM; (3) to refine the tumor contour by a region growing technique. The system has been tested on real patient images with satisfying results. The quantitative evaluations by comparing with experts' manual traces and with other approaches demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available