4.5 Article

Comparison Between Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Malignancies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 268-274

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.011

Keywords

Extraperitoneal; Gynecologic malignancy; Para-aortic lymphadenectomy; Transperitoneal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: Two validated laparoscopic approaches for para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) exist: the transperitoneal and the extraperitoneal. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of both approaches. Design: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic PAL for a gynecologic malignancy between January 2008 and October 2013. Setting: University Hospital. Patients: Two patients groups were compared: transperitoneal (n = 51) and extraperitoneal (n = 21). Interventions: Paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Measurements and Main Results: The chi(2) test, Fisher's exact test, or Student's t-test were used for univariate analysis and a stepwise logistic regression for multivariate analysis. The threshold of statistical significance was set at 0.05. All patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups (p > .05 for all variables). There was only 1(1.3%) conversion to laparotomy encountered in the transperitoneal PAL group and 3 conversions from extraperitoneal to transperitoneal PAL (14.2%). In 1 case of extraperitoneal PAL, the procedure was abandoned because of inadequate equipment (body mass index 48 kg/m(2)). The mean duration of surgery was longer in the transperitoneal group: 200 min (35-360) versus 125.6 min (45-180) in the extraperitoneal group (p = .001). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the transperitoneal group: 17 (4-37) versus 13 (3-25) in the extraperitoneal group (p = .029). There was no difference in postoperative course and complications between both groups in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In nonobese patients, the extraperitoneal PAL is associated with shorter surgical duration, whereas the transperitoneal approach was associated with a higher number of harvested lymph nodes. As a result of improved ergonomy, the transperitoneal approach enables laparoscopic management of operative complications. (C) 2015 AAGL. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available