4.6 Article

Mentha piperita (peppermint) in growing Japanese quails diet: Performance, carcass attributes, morphology and microbial populations of intestine

Journal

ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 104-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.05.021

Keywords

Japanese quail; Performance; Intestinal morphology; Heal bacterial count

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary Mentha piperita L. (MP, peppermint) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, ileal morphology and intestinal bacterial populations of growing Japanese quails. A total of 360, 7-day-old quail chicks were fed six experimental diets (with 5 replicates and 12 birds each) including a basal diet with no antibiotics (negative control), the basal diet with subtherapeutic amount of flavophospholipol (positive control), MPI (basal diet + 10 g/kg peppermint), MPII (basal diet + 20 g/kg peppermint), MPIII (basal diet +30 g/kg peppermint), and MPIV (basal diet + 40 g/kg peppermint) for 5 weeks. Dietary treatments did not affect bird performance, however, feed intake (P= 0.09) and feed conversion ratio (P= 0.06) in peppermint groups showed an incremental trends from 7 to 35 days of age. Inclusion of peppermint in the diet linearly increased the length of small intestine, villus height, villus width, crypt depth, and villus area (P< 0.001). Regression analysis showed that the maximum villus area and CFU of LAB may be obtained with 28.9 (R-2 = 0.82) and 28.9 g/kg of dietary peppermint (R-2 = 0.93), respectively. However, the minimum CFU of coliforms may be achieved with 22.0 g/kg of dietary peppermint (R-2 = 0.50). From the results of present study, it can be concluded that peppermint at the rate of 20-30 g/kg of diet could be a promising alternative to antibiotics in order to improve intestinal bacterial populations and absorption surface area in growing Japanese quails. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available