4.7 Article

A hybrid finite element-scaled boundary finite element method for crack propagation modelling

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 199, Issue 17-20, Pages 1178-1192

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.12.005

Keywords

Scaled boundary finite element method; Finite element method; Discrete crack model; Multiple cohesive crack propagation; Remeshing; Fracture mechanics

Funding

  1. EPSRC UK [EP/F00656X/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/F00656X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F00656X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops a novel hybrid method that combines the finite element method (FEM) and the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) for crack propagation modelling in brittle and quasi-brittle materials. A very simple yet flexible local remeshing procedure, solely based on the FE mesh, is used to accommodate crack propagation. The crack-tip FE mesh is then replaced by a SBFEM rosette. This enables direct extraction of accurate stress intensity factors (SIFs) from the semi-analytical displacement or stress solutions of the SBFEM, which are then used to evaluate the crack propagation criterion. The fracture process zones are modelled using nonlinear cohesive interface elements that are automatically inserted into the FE mesh as the cracks propagate. Both the FEM's flexibility in remeshing multiple cracks and the SBFEM's high accuracy in calculating SIFs are exploited. The efficiency of the hybrid method in calculating SIFs is first demonstrated in two problems with stationary cracks. Nonlinear cohesive crack propagation in three notched concrete beams is then modelled. The results compare well with experimental and numerical results available in the literature. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available