4.7 Article

Optimal bone density distributions: Numerical analysis of the osteocyte spatial influence in bone remodeling

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 80-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.09.002

Keywords

Osteocytes spatial influence; Remoteness from the sensor; location Bone microstructure; Structural optimization; Optimal control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper a control and optimization procedure for bone remodeling simulations was adopted to study the effect of the osteocyte influence range on the predicted density distribution. In order to reach this goal, the osteocyte network regulating bone remodeling process in a 2-D bone sample was numerically simulated. The assumed proportionalintegral-derivative (PID) bone remodeling rule was related to the error signal between the strain energy density and a selected target. Furthermore the control parameters and the target were optimally determined minimizing a suitable cost index: the goal was to minimize the final mass and the energy thus maximizing the stiffness. The continuum model results show that the developed and adapted trabecular structure was consistent with the applied loads and only depended on the external forces, the value of the cost index, the maximum attainable elastic modulus value (hence, the maximum density value) and the value of the energy target. The remodeling phenomenon determined the number and thickness of the trabeculae which are formed from a uniform distribution of mass density in the considered domain; this number and these thicknesses are controlled by the values assigned to the parameters of the model. In particular, the osteocyte decay distance (D) of the influence range affected the trabecular patterns formation, showing an important effect in the adaptive capacity of the optimization numerical model. 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available