4.7 Article

Development of QRS detection algorithm designed for wearable cardiorespiratory system

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 20-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.07.010

Keywords

QRS detection; HRV; RR interval; Cardiorespiratory belt sensor

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [13555064]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [13555064] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An in-home sleep monitoring system was developed previously in our laboratory for monitoring electrocardiography (ECG) and respiratory signals. However, the ECG signal acquired with this system is prone to high-grade noise caused by motion artifact. Since the detection of the QRS complexes with high accuracy is very important in a computer-based analysis of the ECG, a high accuracy QRS detection algorithm is developed and based on the combination of heart rate indicators and morphological ECG features. The proposed algorithm is tested both on 16h data acquired using the two sensors of our cardiorespiratory belt system, i.e., the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) film and the conductive fabric sheets, and on all 48 records of the MIT/BIH Arrhythmia Database. Satisfying results are obtained for both databases, the sensitivity Se and positive predictivity P, were calculated for each case and results show S-e=[96.98%, 93.76%] and P+=[97.81%, 99.48%] for conductive fabric and PVDF film sensors, respectively, and S-e=99.77% and P+=99.64% in the case of the MIT/BIH Arrhythmia Database. Further, heart rate variability (HRV) measures were calculated using our system and a commercial system. A comparison between systems' results is done to show the usefulness of our developed algorithm used with our cardiorespiratory belt sensor. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available