4.7 Article

Artificial neural network prediction of clozapine response with combined pharmacogenetic and clinical data

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages 91-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.02.004

Keywords

neural network models; clozapine; genetic polymorphism; schizophrenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although one third to one half of refractory schizophrenic patients responds to clozapine, however, there are few evidences currently that could predict clozapine response before the use of the medication. The present study aimed to train and validate artificial neural networks (ANN), using clinical and pharmacogenetic data, to predict clozapine response in schizophrenic patients. Five pharmacogenetic variables and five clinical variables were collated from 93 schizophrenic patients taking clozapine, including 26 responders. ANN analysis was carried out by training the network with data from 75% of cases and subsequently testing with data from 25% of unseen cases to determine the optimal ANN architecture. Then the leave-one-out method was used to examine the generalization of the models. The optimal ANN architecture was found to be a standard feed-forward, fully-connected, back-propagation multilayer perceptron. The overall accuracy rate of ANN was 83.3%, which is higher than that of logistic regression (LR) (70.8%). By using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve as a measure of performance, the ANN outperformed the LR (0.821 +/- 0.054 versus 0.579 +/- 0.068; p < 0.001). The ANN with only genetic variables outperformed the ANN with only clinical variables (0.805 +/- 0.056 versus 0.647 +/- 0.066; p = 0.046). The gene polymorphisms should play an important role in the prediction. Further validation of ANN analysis is likely to provide decision support for predicting individual response. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available