4.5 Article

Asymmetric ν-tube support vector regression

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 371-382

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2014.03.016

Keywords

Robust regression; nu-tube support vector regression; Asymmetric loss; Quantile regression

Funding

  1. Flemish Government
  2. Research Council KUL [GOA/11/05, GOA/10/09, CoE EF/05/006, IOE-SCORES4CHEM]
  3. Flemish Government: FWO [G0226.06, G.0302.07, G.0320.08, G.0558.08, G.0557.08, G.0588.09, G.0377.09, G.0377.12]
  4. IWT
  5. Eureka-Flite+
  6. SBO LeCoPro
  7. SBO Climaqs
  8. SBO POM
  9. OO-Dsquare
  10. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office: IUAP P6/04 (DYSCO, Dynamical systems, control and optimization)
  11. iMinds
  12. EU: ERNSI
  13. ERC AdG A-DATADRIVE-B, FP7-HD-MPC [INFSO-ICT-223854]
  14. COST intelliCIS, FP7-EMBOCON [ICT-248940]
  15. Contract Research: AMINAL
  16. Helmholtz: viCERP, ACCM, Bauknecht, Hoerbiger
  17. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11201079]
  18. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [20520133238, 20520131169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Finding a tube of small width that covers a certain percentage of the training data samples is a robust way to estimate a location: the values of the data samples falling outside the tube have no direct influence on the estimate. The well-known nu-tube Support Vector Regression (nu-SVR) is an effective method for implementing this idea in the context of covariates. However, the nu-SVR considers only one possible location of this tube: it imposes that the amount of data samples above and below the tube are equal. The method is generalized such that those outliers can be divided asymmetrically over both regions. This extension gives an effective way to deal with skewed noise in regression problems. Numerical experiments illustrate the computational efficacy of this extension to the nu-SVR. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available