4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Correlation stress testing for value-at-risk: an unconstrained convex optimization approach

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 427-462

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-008-9231-4

Keywords

Stress testing; Convex optimization; Newton's method; Augmented Lagrangian functions

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D502535/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/D502535/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlation stress testing is employed in several financial models for determining the value-at-risk (VaR) of a financial institution's portfolio. The possible lack of mathematical consistence in the target correlation matrix, which must be positive semidefinite, often causes breakdown of these models. The target matrix is obtained by fixing some of the correlations (often contained in blocks of submatrices) in the current correlation matrix while stressing the remaining to a certain level to reflect various stressing scenarios. The combination of fixing and stressing effects often leads to mathematical inconsistence of the target matrix. It is then naturally to find the nearest correlation matrix to the target matrix with the fixed correlations unaltered. However, the number of fixed correlations could be potentially very large, posing a computational challenge to existing methods. In this paper, we propose an unconstrained convex optimization approach by solving one or a sequence of continuously differentiable (but not twice continuously differentiable) convex optimization problems, depending on different stress patterns. This research fully takes advantage of the recently developed theory of strongly semismooth matrix valued functions, which makes fast convergent numerical methods applicable to the underlying unconstrained optimization problem. Promising numerical results on practical data (RiskMetrics database) and randomly generated problems of larger sizes are reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available