4.7 Article

On the Assumed Natural Strain method to alleviate locking in solid-shell NURBS-based finite elements

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages 1341-1353

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-014-0978-4

Keywords

Isogeometric analysis; Solid-shell NURBS element; Assumed Natural Strain; Shear locking; Membrane locking

Funding

  1. Ministrio da Educao e Cincia, Portugal [SFRH/BD/70815/2010, PTDC/EMS- TEC/0899/2012]
  2. European Research Council through the Project ISOBIO [259229]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [259229] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EMS-TEC/0899/2012, SFRH/BD/70815/2010] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In isogeometric analysis (IGA), the functions used to describe the CAD geometry (such as NURBS) are also employed, in an isoparametric fashion, for the approximation of the unknown fields, leading to an exact geometry representation. Since the introduction of IGA, it has been shown that the high regularity properties of the employed functions lead in many cases to superior accuracy per degree of freedom with respect to standard FEM. However, as in Lagrangian elements, NURBS-based formulations can be negatively affected by the appearance of non-physical phenomena that lock the solution when constrained problems are considered. In order to alleviate such locking behaviors, the Assumed Natural Strain (ANS) method proposed for Lagrangian formulations is extended to NURBS-based elements in the present work, within the context of solid-shell formulations. The performance of the proposed methodology is assessed by means of a set of numerical examples. The results allow to conclude that the employment of the ANS method to quadratic NURBS-based elements successfully alleviates non-physical phenomena such as shear and membrane locking, significantly improving the element performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available