4.5 Article

Computational modeling of plastic deformation and shear banding in bulk metallic glasses

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 494-504

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.014

Keywords

Bulk metallic glasses; Viscosity; Free volume; Shear band; Plastic deformation; ABAQUS

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific through a grant (AFOSR) [FA9550-09-1-0251]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of plastic deformation of bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) reveals two modes. At low temperatures and high stresses plastic deformation is inhomogeneous, in which case the failure of BMGs is mostly due to the formation of a very thin shear band. Inside this band, the evolving strain is highly localized. At high temperatures and low stresses, plastic deformation is homogeneous and the BMGs exhibit a Newtonian viscosity. It is generally acknowledged that the shear-induced free volume evolution plays an important role in the failure of BMGs under both modes of deformation. In this paper, a free volume-based constitutive model is proposed, which accounts for the transition of inhomogeneous to homogeneous deformation and non-Newtonian to Newtonian viscosity. A time integration algorithm is presented in this paper with a description of its implementation in the commercial code ABAQUS through the user-defined material window UMAT. 2 and 3-Dimensional finite element simulations are performed and the model is validated with results of uniaxial compression and micro-indentation experiments for a wide range of temperatures and strain rates. The simulation results exhibit hydrostatic pressure dependence, and suggest that a mixed-power-strain-rate-dependent free volume creation mode is more effective than the commonly used strain-rate-dependent free volume creation law, when considering large temperature ranges. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available