4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

On the derivation of symbolic form of stiffness matrix and load vector of a beam with an arbitrary number of transverse cracks

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 253-260

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.013

Keywords

Beams with transverse cracks; Transverse displacements; Simplified computational model; Principle of virtual work; Finite element method; Stiffness matrix; Load vector

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers derivation of the stiffness matrix and the load vector due to a uniform transverse load for an already-known simplified computational model of a slender beam having an arbitrary number of transverse cracks. The principle of virtual work allows for the coefficients of the stiffness matrix and the load vector to be given in clear and closed analytical forms which enable faster and straightforward evaluation. However, since the derivation approach excludes information about the transverse displacement distributions between the nodes the alternatives for the determination of transverse displacements within the finite element are thus further discussed to complete the analysis of multi-cracked beams. Also these results are given in clear and closed analytical forms. The presented stiffness matrix is ideal for modeling any flexural cracks of beams and columns near supports and joints with other structural elements which is, for example, required in earthquake engineering, where the European earthquake engineering design code EC8 requires the cracks to be included in the analysis of concrete elements. Furthermore, as the newly-presented form of stiffness matrix makes the influence of the depths and locations of the cracks to the flexural bending deformation more recognizable that may also open new possibilities in the identification of cracks. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available