4.3 Article

Biofilm formation of the L. monocytogenes strain 15G01 is influenced by changes in environmental conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 189-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.10.022

Keywords

Listeria monocytogenes; Biofilm; Crystal violet assay; Persistence

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) [CAWX0301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Listeria monocytogenes 15G01, a strain belonging to the persistent pulsotype 5132, was isolated from a seafood processing plant in New Zealand. Simple monoculture assays using crystal violet staining showed good biofilm formation for this strain and it was therefore chosen to be further investigated in regard to its biofilm forming ability. To evaluate its behaviour in different conditions commonly encountered in food processing environments, biofilm assays and growth studies were performed using common laboratory media under a range of temperatures (20 degrees C, 30 degrees C and 37 degrees C). Furthermore, the effects of incubation time and different environmental conditions including static, dynamic and anaerobic incubation on biofilm formation were investigated. Changes in the environmental conditions resulted in different biofilm phenotypes of L. monocytogenes 15G01. We demonstrated that increasing temperature and incubation time led to a higher biofilm mass and that dynamic incubation has little effect on biofilm formation at 37 degrees C but encourages biofilm formation at 30 degrees C. Biofilm production at 20 degrees C was minimal regardless of the medium used. We furthermore observed that anaerobic environment led to reduced biofilm mass at 30 degrees C for all tested media but not at 37 degrees C. Biofilm formation could not be narrowed down to one factor but was rather dependent on multiple factors with temperature and medium having the biggest effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available