4.0 Article

On the temporal stability of the coda of ambient noise correlations

Journal

COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE
Volume 346, Issue 11-12, Pages 307-316

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2014.10.002

Keywords

Seismic waves; Ambient noise monitoring; Scattering

Funding

  1. European Research Council [L27507]
  2. Heisenberg program of the German research Foundation (DFG)
  3. Rhone-Alpes region [CPER07_13 CIRA]
  4. France Grilles
  5. CNRS MASTODONS program
  6. National Science Foundation (USA) [EAR-1063471]
  7. NSF Office of Polar Programs
  8. DOE (USA) National Nuclear Security Administration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the sensitivity of cross correlations to the anisotropy of the incident field in the context of seismic ambient noise monitoring of small velocity changes. Numerical simulations of elastic waves are performed in a 2D scattering plate with a focus on the comparative character of the direct and coda waves in the cross-correlation. We show that coda waves reconstructed from cross-correlations are far more robust than direct waves in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy of the incident field. We observe similar behavior with real data recorded on Erebus volcano, where a database of impulsive icequakes is used to simulate an anisotropic source field. We propose a simplified approach to evaluate the sensitivity of scattered waves to the anisotropy of the incoming noise field. We rely on previous results obtained for direct waves and on intrinsic properties of scattered waves to predict the errors produced by strong source anisotropy with numerical experiments. These results also yield realistic values for monitoring the accuracy to be expected with real data at crustal scales. Our analysis shows that high-precision noise-based monitoring could be performed with coda waves in the correlation functions, even in the presence of variations in the azimuthal distribution of the ambient noise field. (C) 2014 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available