4.1 Article

Structural changes in stimuli-responsive nanoparticle/dendrimer composite films upon vapor sorption

Journal

COMPTES RENDUS CHIMIE
Volume 12, Issue 1-2, Pages 129-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.crci.2008.09.001

Keywords

Au-nanoparticle; Dendritic polymer; Neutron reflectometry; Vapor sorption; Thin composite film; Stimuli-responsive layer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Au-nanoparticle/dendrimer composite films are stimuli-responsive materials with a potential application as highly sensitive chemiresistive sensors, since their conductance strongly changes upon sorption of chemical species from vapor phase. Here we report on the neutron reflectometry studies on such films exposed to water, methanol, and toluene vapors as external stimuli. Poly (amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer third generation and poly (propylene imine) (PPI) dendrimer fourth generation were used to build up the films. The interaction between the film and the vapor is mainly governed by the chemical nature of the dendrimer component. Both AuPAMAM and AuPPI films have well expressed affinity to water. The more hydrophilic PAMAM adsorbs about 3 times more water than the more hydrophobic PPI. In contrast, the diffusion of toluene is limited to a thin region near the film/gas phase interface where a thin wetting layer of toluene is registered. Methanol as a solvent with transitional hydrophilicity shows intermediate behavior when interacting with the films. Since this work is largely based on neutron reflectometry we point out that this technique is outstanding in resolving fine details of film response to vapors which is important to understand the changes that occur in the vapors sensing process. To cite this article: N. Krasteva et al., C. R. Chimie 12 (2009). (C) 2008 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available