4.7 Review

Analytical Methods for Determining Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility of Bioactive Compounds from Fruits and Vegetables: A Review

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12049

Keywords

bioaccessibility; bioactive compounds; bioavailability; in vitro methods; in vivo methods

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. European Regional Development Funds [AGL2010-22206-C02-01]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education [AP2010-2546]
  4. Podkarpacie Marshal's Office of RSI Project for Podkarpacie Region, Poland [8.2.2/IV.26/217/11/U/155/12]
  5. Valencian Autonomous Government (Conselleria d'Educacio, Cultura i Esport. Generalitat Valenciana) [APOSTD/2013/092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determination of bioactive compounds content directly from foodstuff is not enough for the prediction of potential in vivo effects, as metabolites reaching the blood system may be different from the original compounds found in food, as a result of an intensive metabolism that takes place during absorption. Nutritional efficacy of food products may be ensured by the determination of bioaccessibility, which provides valuable information in order to select the appropriate dosage and source of food matrices. However, between all the methods available, there is a need to establish the best approach for the assessment of specific compounds. Comparison between in vivo and in vitro procedures used to determine bioaccessibility and bioavailability is carried out, taking into account the strengths and limitations of each experimental technique, along with an intensive description of actual approaches applied to assess bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds. Applications of these methods for specific bioactive compound's bioaccessibility or bioavailability are also discussed, considering studies regarding the bioavailability of carotenoids, polyphenolic compounds, glucosinolates, vitamin E, and phytosterols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available