4.7 Article

Thinner and better: (Ultra-)low grammage bacterial cellulose nanopaper-reinforced polylactide composite laminates

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 126-133

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.027

Keywords

Laminate; Nano composites; Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Mechanical properties; Nanocellulose

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M012247/1]
  2. Department of Aeronautics of Imperial College London
  3. EPSRC [EP/M012247/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the rate-limiting steps in the large-scale production of cellulose nanopaper-reinforced polymer composites is the time consuming dewatering step to produce the reinforcing cellulose nanopapers. In this work, we show that the dewatering time of bacterial cellulose (BC)-in-water suspension can be reduced by reducing the grammage of BC nanopaper to be produced. The influence of BC nanopaper grammage on the tensile properties of BC nanopaper-reinforced polylactide (PLLA) composites is also investigated in this work. BC nanopaper with grammages of 5, 10, 25 and 50 g m(-2) were produced and it was found that reducing the grammage of BC nanopaper from 50 g m(-2) to 5 g m(-2) led to a three-fold reduction in the dewatering time of BC-in-water suspension. The porosity of the BC nanopapers, however, increased with decreasing BC nanopaper grammage. While the tensile properties of BC nanopapers were found to decrease with decreasing BC nanopaper grammage, no significant difference in the reinforcing ability of BC nanopaper with different grammages for PLLA was observed. All PLLA composite laminates reinforced with BC nanopapers possessed similar tensile modulus of 10.5-11.8 GPa and tensile strength of 95-111 MPa, respectively, at a BC loading fraction v(l,BC) = 39-53 vol.-%, independent of the grammage and tensile properties of the reinforcing BC nanopaper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available