4.7 Article

Electro-conditioning of activated sludge in a membrane electro-bioreactor for improved dewatering and reduced membrane fouling

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 494, Issue -, Pages 136-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.051

Keywords

Sludge filterability; Electrokinetics dewatering; Electro-bioreactor; Submerged membrane electro-bioreactor; Membrane fouling; Bound water

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Strategic Project [350666]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of applying a direct current (DC) field on the morphology and structural composition of municipal wastewater flocs and their bound water content was investigated. The effects on sludge dewaterability and membrane fouling were assessed using batch electro-bioreactors and continuous flow submerged membrane electro-bioreactor (SMEBR). Series of batch electro-bioreactors were tested at current densities (CD) ranging between 5 and 35 A/m(2) for three concentrations of mixed liquor suspended solids (from 3000 to 15,000 mg/l) and five electrical exposure modes (time-ON/time-OFF). Results of batch tests showed that CD of 15 to 35 A/m(2) enhanced sludge filterability, represented as specific resistance to filtration (SRF), up to 200 Limes compared to sludge in the control reactor. Electrically enhanced sludge under continuous flow (SMEBR) exhibited a reduction of SRF over the conventional activated sludge from 8 to 86 times, while membrane fouling rate decreased by 6 Limes, It was assumed that the removal of organic materials and soluble microbial products (SMP) through electro-coagulation (up to 90% for polysaccharides and up to 50% for protein), reduction of bound water by electroosmosis, increasing floc size through electro-bio-flocculation and the reduction of sludge organic/inorganic ratio were the major mechanisms contributed to SRF and membrane fouling reduction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available