4.7 Article

Influence of hard segment content and nature on polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 8, Pages 1030-1038

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.02.006

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes; Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Mechanical properties; Fracture; Interfacial strength

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [TME-2008-01156]
  2. Basque Country Governments [CIC-inanoGUNE-ETORTEK 0911]
  3. Grupos Consolidados [IT-365-07]
  4. SAIOTEK [S-PE09UN07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of how polyurethanes, PU, complexity affects their derived multiwalled carbon nanotube, MWCNT, composites could shed important clues for preparing future tailored PU/MWCNT elastic, strong and electrically conductive composites. In this regard, hard segment content and nature, along with MWCNT functionalisation, are believed to have great influence on both nanoscale PU/MWCNT self assembling mechanisms and on final composites properties. In this work the effect of PU hard segment content into composites was analysed. According to the results, a preferential interaction of nanotubes with polyurethanes hard segments can be assumed although nanotubes introduction hindered both soft and hard segments crystallisation. In all cases carbon nanotubes percolative network formation seemed to be crucial for obtaining significant reinforcement, being observed at this stage, a reduction of ductility, phenomena which is related to an increase on hard domains interconnections by MWCNT. The hard to soft segment ratio into PU plays a crucial role on determining the stress transfer to MWCNT. In addition, PU hard domains nature has important effect on nanotubes reinforcing character, this fact being related to the different PU intrinsic morphologies as well as different PU-MWCNT interactions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available