4.7 Article

Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 970-980

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.014

Keywords

Polymer-matrix composites; Stress-strain curves; Finite element analysis; Damage mechanics; Carbon-epoxy composites; Shear deformation; Interface decohesion; Computational micromechanics

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion de Espana [MAT2006-2602, 2009-14396]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear response of carbon-fiber reinforced epoxy laminates was studied by means of a combination of experiments and numerical simulations. Two cross-ply laminates with the same epoxy matrix and different carbon fibers (high-strength and high-modulus) were tested in shear until failure according to ASTM standard D7078, and the progressive development of damage was assessed by optical microscopy in samples tested up to different strains. The composite behavior was also simulated through computational micromechanics, which was able to account for the effect of the constituent properties (fiber, matrix and interface) on the macroscopic shear response. The influence of matrix, fiber and interface properties on each region and on the overall composite behavior was assessed from the experimental results and the numerical simulations. After the initial elastic region, the shear behavior presented two different regions, the first one controlled by matrix yielding and the second one by the elastic deformation of the fibers. It was found that in-plane shear behavior of cross-ply laminates was controlled by the matrix yield strength and the interface strength and was independent of the fiber properties. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available