Journal
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 15, Pages 2146-2153Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.014
Keywords
Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs); Fragmentation; Modelling; Probabilistic methods; Stress/strain curves
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Most modellings found in literature for the multiple cracking process of 1D composites can be categorised into three different approaches a Continuous Approach (CA) that assumes an infinitely long composite and two random approaches that consider composites of finite length The Random Strength Approach (RSA) rests on a spatial discretization of the composite on which a strength distribution is applied whereas the Random Crack Approach (RCA) generates the location and the strength of each new crack without any discretization The first part of the paper lays the model and its statistical foundations They are used to demonstrate that the three approaches should provide consistent results The three approaches are then introduced with special emphasis on the RCA as it is implemented for the first time without any approximation Finally the results provided by the three approaches are compared confirming their full consistency (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available