4.7 Article

Current leakage prevention in resistance welding of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastics

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 1579-1587

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.008

Keywords

resistance welding; polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); coating; welding/joining; current leakage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current leakage is a concern with resistance welding of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. This phenomenon is particularly important when unidirectional adherends, with the carbon fibres parallel to the electrical current direction, are welded. In this investigation, a new electrically-insulated heating element consisting of a ceramic-coated (TiO2) stainless steel mesh was developed to prevent current leakage. Special specimen geometry, called a skin/stringer configuration, was welded with this newly developed heating element to represent typical reinforced aerospace structures. The adherends were made of APC-2/AS4 (carbon fibre/PEEK) composites. Unidirectional specimens, which represent the most critical case, were first welded using the new heating element. The insulated heating element successfully prevented current leakage and showed great improvement in temperature homogeneity over the weld area. The impact of the new heating element on the mechanical performance of the welds was then assessed by welding quasi-isotropic specimens. The mechanical performances of quasi-isotropic specimens welded using the new insulated heating elements and conventional (non-insulated) ones were compared under short beam and three-point bending tests. No mechanical performance drawback was observed with the new heating element; however, the failure mode of the welded quasi-isotropic specimens was changed from a delamination in the skin laminate failure to a weld interface debonding failure. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available