4.7 Article

Postbuckling of nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells under combined axial and radial mechanical loads in thermal environment

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 311-322

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.034

Keywords

Nano-structures; Buckling; Analytical modeling; Functionally graded materials

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51279103]
  2. Fund of State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering [GKZD010059]
  3. University of Western Sydney Australia [20721-80872]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A postbuckling analysis is presented for nanocomposite cylindrical shells reinforced by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) subjected to combined axial and radial mechanical loads in thermal environment. Two types of carbon nanotube-reinforced composite (CNTRC) shells, namely, uniformly distributed (UD) and functionally graded (FG) reinforcements, are considered. The material properties of FG-CNTRCs are assumed to be graded in the thickness direction, and are estimated through a micro-mechanical model. The governing equations are based on a higher order shear deformation shell theory with a von Karman-type of kinematic nonlinearity. The thermal effects are also included and the material properties of CNTRCs are assumed to be temperature-dependent. A boundary layer theory and associated singular perturbation technique are employed to determine the buckling loads and postbuckling equilibrium paths. The numerical illustrations concern the postbuckling behavior of perfect and imperfect, FG-CNTRC cylindrical shells under combined action of external pressure and axial compression for different values of load-proportional parameters. The results for UD-CNTRC shell, which is a special case in the present study, are compared with those of the FG-CNTRC shell. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available