4.7 Article

Volume integral equation method for multiple circular and elliptical inclusion problems in antiplane elastostatics

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 1224-1243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.066

Keywords

Computational modelling; Numerical analysis; Fibres; Anisotropy; Volume Integral Equation Method (VIEM)

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0022211]
  3. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) supercomputing center [KSC-2011-C1-01]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0022211] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Volume Integral Equation Method (VIEM) is introduced for the solution of elastostatic problems in an unbounded isotropic elastic solid containing interacting multiple isotropic and anisotropic circular/elliptical inclusions subject to remote antiplane shear. This method is applied to two-dimensional problems involving long parallel cylindrical inclusions. A detailed analysis of the stress field at the interface between the matrix and the central inclusion is carried out for square and hexagonal packing of isotropic and anisotropic inclusions. The effects of the number of isotropic and anisotropic inclusions and various fiber volume fractions on the stress field at the interface between the matrix and the central circular/elliptical inclusion are also investigated in detail. The accuracy of the method is validated by solving single isotropic and orthotropic circular/elliptical inclusion problems and multiple isotropic circular and elliptical inclusion problems for which solutions are available in the literature. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available