4.7 Article

A critical reliability evaluation of fibre reinforced composite materials based on probabilistic micro and macro-mechanical analysis

Journal

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 446-453

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.05.005

Keywords

Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Mechanical properties; Micro-mechanics; Statistical properties/methods Reliability

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Ministry of Defence (MOD), United Kingdom
  3. EPSRC [EP/C548590/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C548590/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In probabilistic composite mechanics, uncertainty modelling may be introduced at a constituent (micro-scale), ply (meso-scale) or component (macro-scale) level. Each of these approaches has particular advantages/limitations and appropriate fusing and benchmarking is desirable in order to improve confidence in probabilistic performance estimates of composite structures. In the present study, random variable based micro and macro-scale reliability analyses are critically compared through a limit state formulation based on the analytical stress tensor components of a rectangular simply supported orthotropic FRP composite plate and the Tsai-Hill failure criterion. The study aims to promote cross-fertilisation of alternative uncertainty modelling approaches in a multi-scale analysis framework. Propagation of uncertainty from micro to macro-scale, and the corresponding influence of changes in random variability on the reliability estimates is quantified. The importance of benchmarking experimentally-based probability distributions of mechanical properties through micro-scale modelling is illustrated, and the confidence that can be placed on reliability estimates is quantified through a series of numerical examples. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available