4.7 Article

Sulfonated polyimide/s-MoS2 composite membrane with high proton selectivity and good stability for vanadium redox flow battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 490, Issue -, Pages 179-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.053

Keywords

Vanadium redox flow battery; Sulfonated polyimide; Composite membrane; Proton selectivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [21206138]
  2. Team Research Project from Southwest University of Science and Technology [13zxbk02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the fabrication and properties of high performance and inexpensive composite membranes of sulfonated polyimide (SPI) and sulfonated molybdenum disulfide (s-MoS2) for the vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) application. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images reveal the uniformity of SPI/s-MoS2 membrane. Both EDS and XRD results verify the existence of s-MoS2 in SPI/s-MoS2 membrane and show the interaction between SPI and s-MoS2. The physico-chemical properties of as-prepared SPI/sMoS(2) membrane, including water uptake and ion exchange capacity, etc. are evaluated and compared to those of SPI SPI/MoS2 and Nafion 117 membranes, respectively. The SPI/s-MoS2 membrane possesses increased proton conductivity and reduced vanadium ion permeability than pure SPI membrane, and it has the highest proton selectivity (2.24 x 10(5) S min cm(-3)) among all membranes. The VRFB with SPI/sMoS(2) membrane presents a higher coulombic efficiency (CE) and energy efficiency (EE) compared with Nafion 117 at the current density ranging from 20 to 80 mA cm(-2). The SPI/s-MoS2 membrane shows a longer discharge time (193 h above 0.8 V) than Nafion 117 (72 h). Moreover, the SPlis-MoS2 membrane exhibits stable operation performance up to 500 cycles with no significant decline in CE and EE. All experimental results confirm that the SPI/s-MoS2 membrane is suitable for use in VRFB. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available