4.7 Article

An ultrasonic assisted direct contact membrane distillation hybrid process for desalination

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 476, Issue -, Pages 59-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.028

Keywords

Membrane distillation; Ultrasonic irradiation; Desalination; Permeate flux; Polytetrafluoroethylene

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51138008, 51108445]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry [13Z04ESPCT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel ultrasonic assisted direct contact membrane distillation (USDCMD) hybrid process was designed and the effects of feed temperature, feed concentration, feed velocity, ultrasonic power and frequency on mass transfer were investigated. Under ultrasonic irradiation, changes and damages in membrane structure were found on PVDF membrane, while the pore size and the stretching strain of PP fibers were also enlarged and declined, respectively. The PTFE hollow fiber was selected to carry out USDCMD. The results showed that ultrasonic irradiation could effectively enhance mass transfer. Under the ultrasonic irradiation of 20 kHz and 260 W, the maximum permeate flux enhancement of 60% was obtained under conditions of feed temperature of 53 degrees C, feed velocity of 025 m/s and feed salt concentration of 140 g/L. The increment was enlarged with the decrease of feed temperature, feed velocity and ultrasonic frequency as well as the increase of feed concentration and ultrasonic power. Ultrasonic irradiation had no significant influence on the mechanical strength, pore size and hydrophobicity of the FIFE membrane in a 240 h continuous USDCMD experiment, and the novel membrane distillation process exhibited satisfying performance stability, which indicated that ultrasonic irradiation can be applied to membrane distillation for mass transfer enhancement. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available