4.7 Article

A valid inhomogeneous cell-based smoothed finite element model for the transient characteristics of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic structures

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages 298-313

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.074

Keywords

Inhomogeneous cell-based smoothed finite element method; Modified Newmark method; Functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic material; Transient response

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875241, 51505180]
  2. Jilin Provincial Department of Education [JJKH20180084KJ]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Jilin Provincial Department of Science & Technology Fund Project [20160520064JH, 20170101043JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For the sake of surmounting defect of over-stiffness of finite element model (FEM) and accurately solving the transient response problems of structures comprise functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic (FGMEE) materials, we put forward an inhomogeneous cell-based smoothed finite element model (ICS-FEM) and a modified Newmark method. By employing the inhomogeneous gradient smoothing technique into FEM, the mass matrix M and the equivalent stiffness matrix K(eq )are derived, ICS-FEM that provides a stiffness coinciding with the actual condition is also obtained. Moreover, this model can be carried out with user-defined subroutines in the existing FEM software. Several numerical examples including cantilever beams, a layered FGMEE sensor and an FGMEE energy harvester are analyzed, which prove that ICS-FEM could achieve results with higher accuracy and reliability than FEM. ICS-FEM are applied to more complex structures such as FGMEE layered sensor and energy harvester. Therefore, such method to solve the transient characteristics of FGMEE structures can be a reference for the design of smart structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available