4.7 Article

Experimental studies on mechanical properties of cellular structures using Nomex® honeycomb cores

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 2017-2024

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.024

Keywords

Experiment; Compliance; Nomex (R); Honeycomb core; Stress; Strain

Funding

  1. Multidisciplinary Institute of Digitalisation and Energy (MIDE)
  2. Ministry of Education of Finland through National Graduate School in Engineering Mechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental method is presented to obtain the effective in-plane compliance matrices of cellular structures using Nomex (R) honeycomb cores without a priori assumptions such as orthotropy. In this method, firstly, uni-axial tension tests are carried out for different material orientations. The independent variables in these experiments are the material orientation and displacement of the actuator, while the main dependent variables are positions of the marker points and the force acting on the specimens. Marker tracking technique is used to determine the marker positions which are processed to get strain of the measuring domain, while the stress is estimated through external loading and core geometry. The analysis is confined to the measuring domain under near homogeneous stress and strain fields. The experiment results are processed with transformation and least squares functions to obtain all effective in-plane elastic parameters, which are compared with analytical solution based on deformation of idealized cell structure. Through this comparison, the effects of geometrical parameters of cell structure are discussed in detail. By means of the introduced method, the problem of lack of experimental studies on the effective in-plane compliances of cellular structures in the literature is expected to be solved. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available