4.5 Article

Characterization of arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT) activities and action spectrum for suppression in the band-legged cricket, Dianemobius nigrofasciatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.12.016

Keywords

Action spectrum; Arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase; Blue wave-opsin; Dianemobius nigrofasciatus; Kinetic assay

Funding

  1. JSPS [18380043, 20-777]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18380043] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT), constituting a large family of enzymes, catalyzes the transacetylation from acetyl-CoA to monoamine substrates, although homology among species is not very high. AANAT in vertebrates is photosensitive and mediates circadian regulation. Here, we analyzed AANAT of the cricket, Dianemobius nigrofasciatus. The central nervous system contained AANAT activity. The optimum pHs were 6.0 (a minor peak) and 10.5 (a major peak) with crude enzyme solution. We analyzed the kinetics at pH 10.5 using the sample containing collective AANAT activities, which we term AANAT. Lineweaver-Burk plot and secondary plot yielded a K-m for tryptamine as substrate of 0.42 mu M, and a V-max of 9.39 nmol/mg protein/min. The apparent Km for acetyl-CoA was 59.9 mu M and the V-max was 8.14 nmol/mg protein/min. AANAT of a nigrofasciatus was light-sensitive. The activity was higher at night-time than at day-time as in vertebrates. To investigate most effective wavelengths on AANAT activity, a series of monochromatic lights was applied (350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600 and 650 nm). AANAT showed the highest sensitivity to around 450 nm and 550 nm. 450 nm light was more effective than 550 nm light. Therefore, the most effective light affecting AANAT activity is blue light, which corresponds to the absorption spectrum of blue wave (BW)-opsin. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available