4.1 Article

A prediction model for root caries in an elderly population

Journal

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 44-52

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00569.x

Keywords

elderly; incidence; prediction model; root caries

Funding

  1. Mexican Institute of Social Security [FOFOI-IMSS2003/144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Objectives: To identify factors associated with root caries development in a 12- month period, in an elderly Mexican population, so as to develop a prediction model for the occurrence of root caries. Methods: A case-cohort study was carried out with 698 randomly selected beneficiaries of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS), residing in the southeast of Mexico City. Initially, base line (t(0)) data regarding sociodemographic variables, general health, general and oral healthy habits, salivary conditions, cariogenic microorganisms and oral health clinical indicators were collected. Twelve months from the date of the first clinical evaluation (t(1)), a new examination was carried out to determine the root caries increment. Variables that showed a significant association (P < 0.05) with the root caries increment were included in the prediction model. Results: Six hundred and ninety-eight elderly subjects were included in the cohort (t(0)), with 76.1% (n = 531) of the elderly patients followed up at 12 months (t(1)). Incidence of root caries was 21.7% (n = 115), a mean root caries increase of 0.4 (1.0) surfaces. The variables, DLBA limitations (Yes), smoking (Yes), mouthwash (No), Mutans streptococci (>= 105 CFU/ml), healthy root surfaces (>= 6) and Root Caries Index (>= 8%), showed a statistically significant association (P < 0.05). This model showed a correct classification in 80.0% (n = 425) and an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.75. Conclusions: This is a good prediction model for the 12 months root caries increment in this population of elderly Mexicans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available