4.5 Article

With whom to dine? Ravens' responses to food-associated calls depend on individual characteristics of the caller

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 33-42

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.10.015

Keywords

common raven; Corvus corax; food-associated call; playback; recruitment

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y-366-B17, W-1234-G17]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Y 366] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upon discovering food, common ravens, Corvus corax, produce far-reaching 'haa' calls or yells, which are individually distinct and signal food availability to conspecifics. Here, we investigated whether ravens respond differently to 'haa' calls of known and unknown individuals. In a paired playback design, we tested responses to 'haa' call sequences in a group containing individually marked free-ranging ravens. We simultaneously played call sequences of a male and a female raven in two different locations and varied familiarity (known or unknown to the local group). Ravens responded strongest to dyads containing familiar females, performing more scan flights above and by perching in trees near the respective speaker. Acoustic analysis of the calls used as stimuli showed no sex-, age-or familiarity-specific acoustic cues, but highly significant classification results at the individual level. Taken together, our findings indicate that ravens respond to individual characteristics in 'haa' calls, and choose whom to approach for feeding, i.e. join social allies and avoid dominant conspecifics. This is the first study to investigate responses to 'haa' calls under natural conditions in a wild population containing individually marked ravens. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available