4.3 Article

Effects of Cohabitation on the Population Performance and Survivorship of the Invasive Mosquito Aedes albopictus and the Resident Mosquito Aedes notoscriptus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 375-385

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjv004

Keywords

Aedes albopictus; Aedes notoscriptus; Australia; cohabitation; population performance index

Funding

  1. Australian Biosecurity Co-operative Research Council for Emerging Infectious Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in the Torres Strait of northern Australia increases the potential for colonization and establishment on the mainland. However, there is a possibility that native species that occupy the same habitats may influence the population performance of Ae. albopictus, potentially affecting the establishment of this species in Australia. Cohabitation experiments were performed with the endemic Aedes notoscriptus (Skuse), which has been found occupying the same larval habitats as Ae. albopictus in the Torres Strait and is the most widespread container-inhabiting Aedes species in Australia. The influence of environmental factors and cohabitation between the two species was examined using different climates, food resource levels, food resource types, and species densities. Survivorship proportions and a population performance index (lambda') were calculated and compared. The consequences of increased Ae. notoscriptus densities were reduced survivorship and lambda' for Ae. albopictus. Despite this, the mean lambda' of Ae. albopictus and Ae. notoscriptus was consistently >= 1.06, indicating both species could increase under all conditions, potentially due to increasing conspecific densities negatively affecting Ae. notoscriptus. The outcomes from this study suggest that the preexisting presence of Ae. notoscriptus may not prevent the establishment of Ae. albopictus in Australia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available