4.6 Article

On the Order of Accuracy and Numerical Performance of Two Classes of Finite Volume WENO Schemes

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 807-827

Publisher

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.291109.080410s

Keywords

Weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) schemes; finite volume schemes; accuracy

Funding

  1. NSFC [10871190, 10671190]
  2. ARO [W911NF-08-1-0520]
  3. NSF [DMS-0809086]
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0809086] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we consider two commonly used classes of finite volume weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) schemes in two dimensional Cartesian meshes. We compare them in terms of accuracy, performance for smooth and shocked solutions, and efficiency in CPU timing. For linear systems both schemes are high order accurate, however for nonlinear systems, analysis and numerical simulation results verify that one of them (Class A) is only second order accurate, while the other (Class B) is high order accurate. The WENO scheme in Class A is easier to implement and costs less than that in Class B. Numerical experiments indicate that the resolution for shocked problems is often comparable for schemes in both classes for the same building blocks and meshes, despite of the difference in their formal order of accuracy. The results in this paper may give some guidance in the application of high order finite volume schemes for simulating shocked flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available