4.6 Article

An Algorithm for the Stochastic Simulation of Gene Expression and Heterogeneous Population Dynamics

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 89-112

Publisher

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.280110.070510a

Keywords

Constant-number Monte Carlo; stochastic simulation algorithm; gene expression; heterogeneous population dynamics

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Academy of Finland [129657, 124615]
  4. Tampere Graduate School in Information Science and Engineering (TISE)
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [124615, 124615] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an algorithm for the stochastic simulation of gene expression and heterogeneous population dynamics. The algorithm combines an exact method to simulate molecular-level fluctuations in single cells and a constant-number Monte Carlo method to simulate time-dependent statistical characteristics of growing cell populations. To benchmark performance, we compare simulation results with steady-state and time-dependent analytical solutions for several scenarios, including steady-state and time-dependent gene expression, and the effects on population heterogeneity of cell growth, division, and DNA replication. This comparison demonstrates that the algorithm provides an efficient and accurate approach to simulate how complex biological features influence gene expression. We also use the algorithm to model gene expression dynamics within bet-hedging cell populations during their adaption to environmental stress. These simulations indicate that the algorithm provides a framework suitable for simulating and analyzing realistic models of heterogeneous population dynamics combining molecular-level stochastic reaction kinetics, relevant physiological details and phenotypic variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available