4.7 Article

Fuel-rich methane oxidation in a high-pressure flow reactor studied by optical-fiber laser-induced fluorescence, multi-species sampling profile measurements and detailed kinetic simulations

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 161, Issue 7, Pages 1688-1700

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.01.007

Keywords

Oxidative coupling of methane (OCM); Profile reactor; Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF); Detailed kinetics; Reactor modeling; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)

Funding

  1. Cluster of Excellence Unifying Concepts in Catalysis (UniCat), Berlin
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A versatile flow-reactor design is presented that permits multi-species profile measurements under industrially relevant temperatures and pressures. The reactor combines a capillary sampling technique with a novel fiber-optic Laser-Induced Fluorescence (LIF) method. The gas sampling provides quantitative analysis of stable species by means of gas chromatography (i.e. CH4, O-2, CO, CO2, H2O, H-2, C2H6, C2H4), and the fiber-optic probe enables in situ detection of transient LIF-active species, demonstrated here for CH2O. A thorough analysis of the LIF correction terms for the temperature-dependent Boltzmann fraction and collisional quenching are presented. The laminar flow reactor is modeled by solving the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in conjunction with a detailed kinetic mechanism. Experimental and simulated profiles are compared. The experimental profiles provide much needed data for the continued validation of the kinetic mechanism with respect to C-1 and C-2 chemistry; additionally, the results provide mechanistic insight into the reaction network of fuel-rich gas-phase methane oxidation, thus allowing optimization of the industrial process. (C) 2014 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available