4.7 Article

Laminar flame propagation of atmospheric iso-cetane/air and decalin/air mixtures

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 161, Issue 1, Pages 154-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.07.014

Keywords

Flame propagation; Laminar flames; Kinetic modeling; iso-Cetane; Decalin

Funding

  1. United Technologies Research Center [N00014-09-C-0211]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-11-1-0924]
  3. NSFC [51176095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laminar flame speeds of iso-cetane/air and decalin/air mixtures were measured in the counterflow configuration at atmospheric pressure and an elevated unburned mixture temperature of 443 K. Axial flow velocities were measured along the stagnation streamline using the digital particle image velocimetry. The laminar flame speeds were determined by determining the variation of a reference flame speed as a function of strain rate and computationally assisted non-linear extrapolations. The data are the first to be reported in the literature, and they were modeled using a recently developed kinetic model that includes 187 species and 6086 elementary reactions. In general, the computed results were found to be in close agreement with the data. In order to get insight into kinetic effects on flame propagation, detailed sensitivity and reaction path analyses were performed using the computed flame structures. The results revealed that at the same equivalence ratio, laminar flame speeds of iso-cetane/air mixtures are lower than those of n-hexadecane/air mixtures. Additionally, it was found that the laminar flame speeds of iso-cetane/air and decalin/air mixtures are sensitive largely to C-0-C-4 kinetic subset, and that the lower reactivity of iso-cetane compared to n-hexadecane could be attributed to the higher production of relatively stable intermediates. (C) 2013 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available