4.7 Article

Comparison of thermal and catalytic cracking of 1-heptene from ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulations

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 160, Issue 4, Pages 766-775

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.12.007

Keywords

ReaxFF; Endothermic reactions; Supercritical conditions; Aviation fuel; Heat sink capacity

Funding

  1. Air Force Research Laboratory under SBIR [FA8650-11-C-2185]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endothermic catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon fuels is one of the most effective methods for thermal management in high-speed jet engines. Despite extensive research, improved understanding of fundamental reaction mechanisms and chemical events associated with hydrocarbon cracking reactions remains desirable. In this investigation, we used the ReaxFF force field to investigate the initial reaction pathways involved in hydrocarbon cracking over amorphous silica, hydrated amorphous silica, and amorphous aluminosilicate nanoparticles. We performed ReaxFF simulations at 1750, 1850, and 1950 K on large interface systems (similar to 2250 atoms) composed of an amorphous silica particle surrounded by 100 hydrocarbon molecules. Hydrocarbon cracking proceeded via complex network of reaction pathways and produced hydrogen and a wide range of saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbon products, consistent with experimental results. Analysis of trajectories from ReaxFF simulations showed complex initiation chemistry for thermal and catalytic cracking of 1-heptene. In general, thermal cracking of 1-heptene was mainly initialed by C-C bond scission followed by free radical reaction mechanism, whereas catalytic cracking was predominantly activated by C-C bond scission, protonation and dehydrogenation. This work demonstrates that ReaxFF reactive force field can be a useful approach for examining the complex chemistry associated with hydrocarbon cracking. (C) 2012 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available