4.5 Article

The value of inflammation markers and body temperature in acute diverticulitis

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 621-626

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12072

Keywords

Diverticulitis; complications; serologic; inflammation; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To determine the diagnostic value of serological infection markers and body temperature in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. Methods Patients in whom diverticulitis was pathologically or radiologically proven at presentation were included. Patients were classified as either complicated (Hinchey Ib, II, III and IV) or uncomplicated (Hinchey Ia) diverticulitis. The discriminative value of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count and body temperature at presentation was tested. Results A total of 426 patients were included in this study of which 364 (85%) presented with uncomplicated and 62 (15%) with complicated diverticulitis. Only CRP was of sufficient diagnostic value (area under the curve 0.715). The median CRP in patients with complicated diverticulitis was significantly higher than in patients with uncomplicated disease (224mg/l, range 99284 vs 87mg/l, range 48151). Patients with a CRP of 25mg/l had a 15% chance of having complicated diverticulitis. This increased from 23% at a CRP value of 100mg/l to 47% for 250mg/l or higher. The optimal threshold was reached at 175mg/l with a positive predictive value of 36%, negative predictive value of 92%, sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 82%. Conclusion WBC count and body temperature are of no value in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated diverticulitis. Only CRP can be used as an indicator for the presence of complications, but a low CRP does not mean that complicated disease can safely be excluded. Therefore, radiological examination remains central in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with diverticulitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available